<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Independence - EdTribune KS - Kansas Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Independence. Data-driven education journalism for Kansas. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://ks.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Independence and Osage City Finished Kansas&apos;s Attendance Series Below Baseline</title><link>https://ks.edtribune.com/ks/2026-10-07-ks-independence-osage-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ks.edtribune.com/ks/2026-10-07-ks-independence-osage-recovery/</guid><description>Independence and Osage City ended Kansas&apos;s available attendance series below their pre-pandemic chronic absence rates. They were unusual in that comparison, although the records do not show whether th...</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Independence and Osage City ended Kansas&apos;s available attendance series below their pre-pandemic chronic absence rates. They were unusual in that comparison, although the records do not show whether the improvement lasted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The series ends in 2021-22. This is a historical look at recovery against 2018-19, rather than a description of attendance in the current school year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among 285 districts with comparable rates at both endpoints, 14 were at or below baseline. The other 271 had higher rates. That gives a recovery share of 4.9% of the comparable districts, rather than a share of Kansas students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The figures come from &lt;a href=&quot;https://ksreportcard.ksde.gov/&quot;&gt;Kansas&apos;s published school attendance reports&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The exceptions in context&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ks/img/2026-10-07-ks-independence-osage-recovery-status.png&quot; alt=&quot;Kansas district reports compared with their pre-pandemic baseline&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the recovered districts, Independence and Osage City were the only ones with at least five hundred students in their final-year attendance report. Those published counts were 2,019 in Independence and 691 in Osage City.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ks/img/2026-10-07-ks-independence-osage-recovery-size.png&quot; alt=&quot;Published attendance enrollment of districts at or below baseline&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The size distinction identifies the reporting group. It does not establish that the results were durable or that larger districts&apos; rates are immune to changes in the students enrolled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Independence&apos;s decline followed an increase&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ks/districts/independence&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Independence&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; had a chronic absence rate of 16.3% at baseline. It rose to 18.4% in 2020-21 before falling to 15.8% in 2021-22. The final rate was modestly below the district&apos;s earlier rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kansas&apos;s statewide rate, by comparison, rose from 13.9% at baseline to 26.2% at the final endpoint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/ks/img/2026-10-07-ks-independence-osage-recovery-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Independence, Osage City and the statewide attendance rate&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The records therefore support a narrow finding: Independence ended this window below baseline while the statewide rate was higher. They do not identify a particular local intervention as the reason.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Osage City finished below baseline despite a final-year rebound&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Osage City had a baseline rate of 24.1%. Its final rate was 19.8%, an improvement of 4.3 percentage points across the endpoints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But its path was not a steady decline. Its rate had fallen to 11.7% in 2020-21 before rising in the final reporting year. Describing Osage City as continuously recovering would miss that rebound.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This also illustrates the limits of the recovery label. A district can be below its pre-pandemic rate and still have a substantial chronic absence rate, or a worsening latest annual change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What remains unknown&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide comparison makes these districts worth examining. Their endpoint results differ from the much more common increase across the comparable district reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The files do not record why the rates changed. They cannot tell whether attendance programmes, student composition, community conditions or reporting practices explain the differences. The historical cutoff also prevents a claim that either district has maintained the result since then.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Independence and Osage City offer documented exceptions within a defined window. Establishing whether their experience provides a useful lesson now requires more recent attendance records and reporting from the districts themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>